data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f81b/2f81b2778ad515753a75674e33235463c19297e4" alt="Home"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8f9e/a8f9ee90eae052024e9095a120aaa49ace783e29" alt="Up"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed0fc/ed0fc18e7953352fe42be80b2c83aba135901810" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7045a/7045ad33189fb57ed2e01798da68b362624366c1" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd332/dd332607390ee107ee489e145fe0c9b3ec039ce4" alt=""
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/acf00/acf000603d14320b45b830af898622f98e45d123" alt="FOURTH KIND"
Ubatuba
UFO Fragments, 1957
On September
14, 1957, Ibrahim Sued, a columnist for the Rio de Janeiro newspaper 0
Globo, printed a letter which he had received, concerning a UFO incident.
Accompanying the letter were three small pieces of white metal. Thus was
ushered in one of the most controversial of all physical-evidence cases.
The writer of the letter described an event in which a "flying disk"
exploded over the beach at Ubatuba, in Sao Paulo Province.
Some of the
metal, which had "rained down" from the exploding disk, was collected, and
three small pieces were included in the letter to Sued. Unfortunately, the
signature on the letter was illegible. Furthermore, the identity of all
witnesses to the original seaside event at Ubatuba remains unknown,
despite extensive searches by the Brazilian representative of the AERIAL
PHENOMENA RESEARCH ORGANIZATION (APRO), Dr. Olavo FONTES. This lack of
witnesses is one of the greatest weaknesses of the Ubatuba case.
This piece
of metal was picked up after a UFO explosion over Toninha's Beach, in
Ubatuba, Sao Paula State, Brazil, in 1957. This sample was analyzed and
the results showed a 99.99% pure magnesium. This other piece fell down
from one of the three UFO's that had flown over the city of Caminas, Sao
Paulo State, Brazil, on December, 1954. Tests proved the material to be
88.91% pure tin. Mr. Sued gave all three pieces of metal to Dr. Fontes,
who in turn had one of them analyzed at the Mineral Production Laboratory
of the Department of Mineral Production in the Brazilian Ministry of
Agriculture. Dr. Fontes personally delivered the samples to the chief
chemist, Dr. Fiegl, an internationally known specialist. A qualitative,
acid test was first made on a small chip, which showed that the fragments
were truly metallic.
One of the
original fragments, designated Sample No.1 by Dr. Fontes, was subdivided
into several pieces and two of the pieces were submitted to the
Spectrographic Section of the Mineral Production Laboratory
Semi-Quantitative Emmission Spectrochemical Analysis. One of the pieces
was analyzed by Dr. Luisa Maria A. Barbosa. The analysis surprisingly
revealed that the sample contained only the element magnesium. A second
fragment of Sample No.1 was submitted to a separate spectrographic
analysis by Mr. Elson Teixeira of the Mineral Production Laboratory. Mr.
Teixeira confirmed Dr. Barbosa's finding that Sample No.1 was pure
magnesium. Further tests were run on fragments of Sample No. 1. These
included Debye-Scherrer-Hull powder pattern X-ray diffraction analysis,
density measurement, and radiation tests.
The
significance of Dr. Barbosa's and Mr. Teixeira's findings is that it is
impossible to produce any element, terrestrially, that is absolutely
spectrographically pure. These results, therefore, are often cited by
proponents of UFO extraterrestrial existence as proof that the Ubatuba
material must be EXTRATERRESTRIAL. Unfortunately, this supposition cannot
be proven, due to the lack of any further Sample No.1 fragments for
verification analysis. The Ubatuba incident is certainly in need of futher
verification, especially the details of the UFO incident itself. All we
have is the word of one anonymous person who wrote the letter received by
a newspaper. The case itself is dated by the receipt of the letter, and
not the incident of the crash, so there are no first hand witnesses to the
UFO incident itself.
Kentucky
Train Collision with Disk UFO, 2002 |
Paintsville,
Kentucky -- At exactly 2:47 a.m. on January 14, 2002, while working
a coal train enroute from Russell, Kentucky to Shelbiana, Kentucky,
our trailing unit and first two cars were severely damaged as we
struck an unknown floating or hovering object. I know it was 2:47
because my watch froze, and to this day shows that time. Along with
my watch the entire electrical systems on both locomotives went
haywire. Approaching a bend near milepost 42 in an area referred to
as the Wild Kingdom, for the many different types of animals spotted
there, my conductor and I saw lights coming from around the way.
This
ordinarily means another train is coming and will pass on the other
track. The outlay of the area is this, the river, #1 track, #2
tracks and a straight up mountainside, carved out for the laying of
these tracks. I killed our lights as not to blind the oncoming crew.
As we rounded the corner our onboard computer began to flash in and
out, speed recorder went nuts, and both locomotives died. Alarm
bells began to ring and that’s when we saw the objects. Apparently
scanning the river for something. At least three objects had several
"search" lights trained there, the first object hovered about 10 to
12 feet above the track.
It was
metallic silver in color with multiple colored lights near the
bottom and in the middle. There were no windows or openings of any
kind that we could see. It was 18 to 20 feet in length and probably
ten feet high. With both engines dead as we rounded the corner we
made little noise and the first object did not respond in time, I
estimate that we hit the object at 30 mph with 16,000 trailing tons
behind us. It clipped the top of our lead unit then skipped back
slicing a chunk out of our trailing unit and first two coal cars.
The other objects vanished.
Our
emergency brakes had initiated due to the loss of power and we
stopped approximately a mile and a half to two miles after impact.
Our power restored after we were stopped and we notified our
dispatcher, located in Jacksonville, Florida of what had happened.
We were told to inspect the cars to see if they'd hold the rail and
try to limp into milepost cmg 60 which used to be the Paintsville
yard which is no longer in full operation. We checked everything out
and the cab of the rear locomotive was demolished and smoking, the
second two cars looked as if they had been hit with a giant hammer,
but looked like they'd hold the rail.
We
pulled into Paintsville yard at approximately 5:15 am. The huge
overhead lights lining the yard were noticeably dark and the only
lights came from what we assumed were railroad officials vehicles
parked near the end of the track. We pulled to a stop and began
unloading our grips off the wounded train. We could hear what
sounded like an army of workers immediately tending to our train.
Vehicle doors slamming, guys running by in weird outfits and lights
glaring from all directions, the one thing missing was railroad
officials.
A guy
named Ferguson shook my hand and asked me to follow him into the old
yard office. We did, once inside they, and by they I mean I have no
idea who these people were, began to ask us hundreds of questions,
they then told us for our own protection we'd be medically tested
before we could leave. I asked repeatedly to talk to my road foreman
or trainmaster and not only were these requests denied but they
confiscated my conductor’s cellular phone.
Hours
later we were led outside the old yard office and the strange things
continued to happen, the 2 locomotives and two cars were removed
from the rest of the train we had brought in and my only guess was
parked 4 tracks over under a huge tent like structure buzzing with
activity. We were led off the property and told, due to national
security, our silence on this matter would be appreciated.
We
were then put in a railroad vehicle and taken to Martin, Kentucky
were we went through questioning again with railroad officials and
were then drug tested. After all of this we were sent on to
Shelbiana, where we took rest for 8 hours and worked another train
back to Russell. Working back we passed by Paintsville, no sign of
the engines, cars, tent, people, nothing. Thanks to
source
and references:
Peter
Davenport |
Report
& Photographs of UFO Landing in Israel, 11-28-05
|
I
enclose my report, first published in our convention last week, and
in our website.
We
still can’t explain the event, and neither the signs left in the
area.
This
is the reason, we send you the report. Maybe someone of your experts
can help us identify what happened here…
We
have a total sum of more then 40 photographs and a video footage
(200M in size – about 10 minutes). I enclosed samples of the photos
separately with this e-mail.
I’ll
be happy to give you more details if asked, and answer any question
you have about the event…
Sincerely
yours,
Hannan
Sabat
Webmaster
– Israeli Center for UFO research (ICFUFOR)
English
site: http://geocities.com/icfufor/
Hebrew
site: www.ufoisrael.org
THE
REPORT is next:
UFO
landing event, in central ISRAEL
Hannan
Sabat (ICFUFOR)
Here
is the report concerning a UFO landing, which occurred between
Sunday and Monday on the 28th of November, 2005.
The
event occurred in one of the agricultural settlements, between the
city of Ramla and the Lod International Airport (central Israel).
According to the witness’s request, we don't publish their names and
the settlement name.
Conclusion:
At
01:30, the witness’s daughter went to take a shower. She heard
noises coming from the yard, and she thought that there is a
possibility that robbers broke into the house, or someone is trying
to steal the vehicle. She turned the lights in the yard on, but she
didn't see anything unusual.
The
witness’s mother-in-law told me in the morning, that she heard the
dogs bark, between 02:00-3:00, but she didn't pay any attention to
the dogs.
After
07:00 in the morning, the witness’s wife went out of their home, and
discovered elliptic signs of imprinting in the house yard. The yard
is assembled from hard pressed coarse sand and small stones. The
woman called her husband, and he called the police. The police send
a team of scouts, and then the police called Mr. Abi Greif (chairman
of ICFUFOR).
At
first, the dogs didn't want to approach the imprinting, and avoided
entering the area. One of the dogs made its needs near the
imprinting. Only after a few hours, the dogs entered freely to the
imprinting.
The
police scouts, checked the house and its surroundings, but didn't
find any clues. When they weren’t able to get into any conclusions,
they indicated in their report, that it is a case of a UFO. The
scouts decided that an object came from above and probably left in
the same direction. They couldn't decide what this object was. Any
signs of an object brought there by someone, or signed of a dune
buggy or any other vehicles, were rejected by the police. According
to the police scouts, a tire sign, seen in the area of the
imprinting, was made there a few days ago. The witness videotaped
the police arrival.
According
to the witness, a helicopter hovered above his house, shortly
afterwards (probably to scan the area).
I
(Hannan Sabat) arrived to the area (thanks to the witness’s
invitation), about 11:00. Beside the witness’s family, or the
police, no one was allowed to get there. With the witness’s help, I
was allowed to check the area and photograph the imprinting (I used
a T70 CANON camera, and an AGFA color film, ASA-200).
Signs
in the area and the signs of the imprinting:
The
central imprinting is about 1.5 – 2 meters in diameter.
It had
a spiral shape, and reminds an oval elliptic shape. Extensions,
turning outside, where found in the surrounding of the central
spiral shape.
The
imprinting was shallow, about 1-2 centimeters in depth. The
imprinting had a different color (brighter) then the soil around it.
Some
of the stones in the imprinting area were pulled out, and some of
them remained lying near their original niches.
Next
to the main imprinting, a deep ditch was seen. It was about 10 cm
deep and 1-1.5 meters in length. The ditch wasn't seen there before.
Near
the ditch a telephone pole found, with soot marks on its two
devices. One of the devices (colored black) was covered with
“V”-shape marks (one above the other). The second device (colored
metal-gray), was covered with some soot. These marks weren’t there
before.
Some
of the grass near the imprinting was covered with a gray dusty
material (and thin sand).
Some
building blocks, located near the imprinting, changed their color
(according to the witness).
A
plastic rope, found next to the building blocks, was stuck to
itself. Also this situation wasn't noticed before the event.
According
the witness, there was another smaller imprinting next to the main
one, but the policeman erased it (with their boots), when they came
there.
I took
35 pictures, and the witness made a video footage (about 10 minutes
length, additional to his own photographs).
We
offer a big thanks to Hannan for sending us the report.
|
Sheriff
Blinded by Light from UFO; Minnesota-1979 |
August
27, 1979-Deputy Sheriff Val Johnson of Marshall County was on duty
that night, driving not far from the North Dakota border, when at
around 1:40 a.m. he saw a light through his side window. It was
obviously not on a road and looked too glaring to be a car
headlight. He first thought it might be a small plane on or very
near the ground. He turned left on another road to try to get closer
to the light to identify it. Suddenly, the light moved toward him,
travelling so fast that it almost instantaneously was upon his car
(covering an estimated mile and a half). Johnson was blinded by the
brilliance of the light and heard glass breaking, then lost
consciousness.
When
he returned to consciousness, the car was stalled and had skidded
across the highway. He felt sluggish and shaky. He radioed
headquarters, at 2:19 a.m., to request assistance. Soon another
deputy arrived, who called an ambulance. The doctor who examined
Johnson found him to be in a mild state of shock. His eyes were
irritated as if Johnson had suffered "mild welder's burns," and
Johnson couldn't stand to be exposed to any bright lights.
The
patrol car had very peculiar damage. The inside headlight on the
driver's side was smashed but not the one to its immediate left.
There was a flat-bottomed circular dent on the left side of the
front hood, about a half inch in diameter, close to the windshield.
There was a crack in the windshield on the driver's side, that ran
from top to bottom, with four apparent impacts. The electric clock
was running 14 minutes slow, as was Johnson's wristwatch. The shaft
of the roof antenna was bent over at a 60-degree angle, starting
about 6 inches above its base. The trunk antenna was bent over at 90
degrees, but only near the top. No damage occurred to the car's
regular antenna on the front hood. Essentially, all the damage to
the car occurred on the left, or driver's side.
Investigations
occurred immediately, both by the sheriff's department and by
investigators from the Center for UFO Studies. The police determined
that Johnson's car traveled about 950 feet after the first damage
occurred. No cause could be found for the event, including collision
with another vehicle or a low-flying plane, a hoax on the part of
Johnson, or anything else. In addition, experts from Ford Motors
(the vehicle was a 1977 Ford LTD) and a team of engineers from
Honeywell examined various portions of the damage.
A
windshield expert, Meridan French, from Ford, noted after examining
the windshield fractures that "Even after several days of reflection
on the crack patterns and apparent sequence of fractures, I still
have no explanation for what seem to be inward and outward forces
acting almost simultaneously. I can only [conclude]... that all
cracks were from mechanical forces of unknown origin." No cause
could be found for the clock running slow, the peculiar antenna
damage, or other physical traces.
Fortunately,
Johnson's eyes healed quickly, and he suffered no lasting effect
from the close encounter.
Val
Johnson's own words...
"This
is Deputy Sheriff Val Johnson... I report in connection with an
incident which happened August 27th, 1979, at approximately 1:40
a.m., western section of Marshall County, approximately ten miles
west of Stephen, Minnesota. This officer was on routine patrol,
westbound down Marshall County Road #5. I got to the intersection of
#5 and Minnesota State #220. When I looked down south #220 to check
for traffic, I noticed a very bright, brilliant light, 8 to 12
inches in diameter, 3 to 4 feet off the ground. The edges were very
defined. I thought perhaps at first that it could be an aircraft in
trouble, as it appeared to be a landing light from an aircraft. "
"I
proceeded south on #220. I proceeded about a mile and three tenths
or a mile and four tenths when the light intercepted my vehicle
causing damage to a headlight, putting a dent in the hood, breaking
the windshield and bending antennas on top of the vehicle. At this
point. at the interception of the light, I was rendered either
unconscious, neutralized or unknowing for a period of approximately
39 minutes. From the point of intersection, my Police vehicle
proceeded south in a straight line 854 feet, at which point the
brakes were engaged by forces unknown to myself, as I do not
remember doing this, and I left about approximately 99 feet of black
marks on the highway before coming to rest sideways in the road with
the grille of my hood facing in an easterly direction. At 2:19 a.m.,
I radioed a 10-88 (Officer Needs Assistance) to my dispatcher in
Warren."
"He
dispatched an officer from Stephen who came out, ascertained the
situation as best he could, called for the Stephen Ambulance to
transport me to Warren Hospital for further tests, x-rays and
observation.
At the
time the officer arrived, I complained about having very sore eyes.
At Warren Hospital, it was diagnosed that I had a mild case of
welder's burns to my eyes. My eyes were treated with some salve and
adhesive bandages put over and instructed to keep them on for the
remainder of the day, or approximately 24 hours. At 11:00 a.m.,
Sheriff Dennis Breckie, my employer, picked me up at my residence in
Oslo, and transported me to an ophthalmologist in Grand Forks, North
Dakota."
" He
examined my eyes and said I had some irritation to the inner
portions of the eye which could have been caused by seeing a bright
light after dark. That is all I have to add except to say that my
timepiece in the Police vehicle and my mechanical wrist watch were
both lacking 14 minutes of time to the minute."
The
most complete account of this case is in The UFO Encyclopedia: The
Phenomenon from the Beginning by Jerome Clark (1998), Omnigraphics.
Other references include Allan Hendry "Minnesota CEII: The Val
Johnson Story," International UFO Reporter Pt. I, 4 (Sept./Oct.
1979):4-9, and Pt II, 4 (November 1979): 4-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28cd7/28cd711575f5210e4146ffb17afee8ccc9c0077b" alt="http://www.ufocasebook.com/valjohnsonreportsmall.jpg"
Police
report-click to see full size |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d87b/2d87b1e27bf1d17a6da879bd5f296e8e167e4ea4" alt="http://www.ufocasebook.com/valjohnsonmapsmall.jpg"
Map
of incident-click to see full size
|
source:
www.ufoskeptic.org
www.nicap.com
THE
CARBONDALE UFO CRASH, 11-11-1974 |
The
Reality, the Hoaxes and the Legend
M.J.
Graeber
THE
WELL-PUBLICISED Kecksburg, Pennsylvania UFO crash of 1965 has
been touted as "Pennsylvania's Roswell" and presented as a
crash recovery story that has been shrouded in a veil of
mystery and governmental conspiracy which is intended to keep
the truth of the incident from the American people. But,
Lackawanna County's city of Carbondale, Pennsylvania is also
the location of a "downed saucer incident" that has caught the
imagination and interests of ufologists and conspiracy
enthusiasts throughout the nation. 9-11 November 2004 marked
the 30th anniversary of Pennsylvania's other Roswell incident.
- the legendary Carbondale UFO crash or perhaps, I should call
it "The Carbondale UFO Capers".
As
one of the three primary UFO investigators of the Carbondale
saucer crash, I feel that it is time for me to present my
recollections and reflections on this occurrence, as well as
some thoughts on how and why the legend of the ill-fated
Carbondale UFO has become a gleaming facet of contemporary
ufological folklore. So, let me start my story at the
beginning.
I
was working quite late on the night of 10 November 1974 (on a
design project) and had sketches and blueprints scattered
about on the dining room table and floor. It was a little
after midnight, (actually 11 November) and I had been
listening to a local radio talk show when the programme's host
suddenly announced that his programme director had just handed
him a note about an unidentified flying object which had
apparently crashed at Carbondale, Pennsylvania. Since I had
appeared on WWDB's Bernie Herman show several times discussing
the UFO phenomenon, I phoned the station without hesitation
and asked if the matter was legitimate or simply a prank. Both
the show's host and his engineer assured me that the report
was indeed "authentic" for they had just taken it directly
from an Associated Press release.
I
then contacted the Carbondale police department about the
situation and spoke to a desk officer who told me that an
airborne object had been observed by a group of five teens
(but only three of the youngsters actually participated in our
inquiry of the sighting), and that the UFO apparently
plummeted into a pond and sank. The youngsters agreed that a
fiery object had fallen to earth in a shower of sparks and
splashed down into a large coal breaker pit or 'silt pond', as
it was called by locals.
The
police had cordoned off the area in an attempt to keep
curiosity seekers from possibly getting injured at the site,
as two areas of the bank of the pond were rather steep and
slippery. The acting police chief, Sgt Francis X. Dottle,
confided that he didn't know what the object in the water was,
but that he and a couple of his men had observed it glowing
while submerged on the night of 9 November - and that it
remained aglow until the wee morning hours of 10 November
(i.e. for a period of about six to eight hours.
As
I later learned, the teens who observed the phenomenon saw a
fiery object streak across the sky, "Coming over Salem
Mountain" in the direction of Russell Park. According to the
boys, they ran into the park from their street corner location
where they were just hanging around on a "nothing else to do"
Saturday night and discovered a strange light glowing in the
pond about twenty feet. from shore. The boys had run about two
blocks to the pond and didn't actually see or hear the object
hit the water. There was a faint "fizz" or sizzling sound
heard, however, and one of the lads said that "it sounded like
someone had thrown a cigarette in the water." So, too, one boy
thought the pond had an odour "like gas from a gas stove",
while another boy said that "the pond just smelled like it
usually does". The mysterious airborne object was described as
being bright whitish-yellow in colour with a trail of reddish
sparks. It was estimated to appear about as large as a five
cent piece (a nickel) held at arm's length. But one of the
boys would later say that it was about "three times the size
of a basketball". No sounds were noted by the teens as the
object appeared to fall towards the earth, and they didn't see
a trail of smoke coming from it either. One boy said, "It
looked like a shooting star". However, later versions of the
story credit the boys with saying the object whistled as it
sped earthward.
The
boys left the pond to report the submerged light to the police
about 7:00 p.m. and when they returned to the pond (around 15
minutes later) they thought that the light had taken up
another position in the water, although no one actually saw
the light moving at that time. The light was described as
being yellow-orange in colour by two of the boys, while the
third witness described it as "yellowish, almost white". The
light on the water's surface appeared as an irregular disc
about 5 feet in diameter. While several UFO researchers would
later describe it as being an irregular shaped glow at 20 feet
in diameter, I performed a very simple experiment with a
flashlight in a darkened room and discovered that the central
portion of the light's beam appeared to be about five feet in
diameter (when directed at the ceiling) and its outer,
fainter, and more widely dispersed light beam was about 4
times larger. This may account for the discrepancy in the
estimates concerning the diameter of the glow on the pond's
surface - or perhaps, the later researchers may have
misinterpreted the boys' statements regarding the "position"
of the light from shore, which was initially reported to be
about twenty feet.
I
asked the officer on the phone if the object might have been a
small private plane, fearing that someone may have been
trapped in an air-pocket within the fuselage's wreckage. He
said that the reports indicated that the object's tremendous
speed and the lack of floating debris on the water seemed to
deny that possibility. I then asked if the object could have
been some sort of "space junk" and informed him that there
were military tracking installations such as NORAD that should
be contacted in regard to the situation. My primary concern
was that if the object were some part of an American or Soviet
spacecraft or satellite which hadn't completely burned up as
it re-entered the Earth's atmosphere, there may have been a
possibility that some portion of its electrical system was
still being powered by the "snap units" (or nuclear batteries)
that were used to power various on-board instrumentation and
guidance systems.
This
seemed to be highly improbable, but, then again, there was
that strange light beneath the pond's surface, a light which
appeared to pulsate with diminishing intensity and at one
point suddenly rushed towards a small boat which police had
launched to further investigate the matter. But, unknown to me
at that time, Sgt Dottle (the Acting Police Chief) had already
been in contact with Dr J. Allen Hynek's Center for UFO
Studies in Evanston, Illinois about the situation. Dr Hynek
advised Sgt Dottle that a meteor or a meteor fragment could
not be the source of the light in the pond because burning
meteors are immediately extinguished when they strike bodies
of water. Sgt Dottle was further advised to obtain a Geiger
counter to see if any radioactivity was present at the crash
site, perhaps as a result of a faulty spacecraft or satellite
re-entry. Obviously, Dr. Hynek also feared that a snap unit
had survived the re-entry and may have been leaking its
contents into the pond.
Upon
hanging up the phone, I awoke my wife, Grace, kissed her and
our sleeping children goodbye, and started the early morning
trek along the north-eastern extension of the Pennsylvania
Turnpike toward Carbondale. As I drove through the Lehigh
Valley I was still listening to radio news reports concerning
the incident - and while some of the accounts seemed to be a
bit sketchy, there were relatives of Carbondale residents
phoning the radio station with additional information and some
obvious rumours too.
As
the events of the Carbondale saucer crash unfolded, the
rumours would include suspicions that a Soviet missile was in
the pond, that only a portion of a Soviet missile was in the
pond, while still another section had crashed into Elk Lake
about 25 miles north-west of Carbondale. There was also a
rumour that an alien space ship had landed - not crashed - in
the silt pond and that the military had managed to recover
whatever was in the water and spirit it away before anyone had
an opportunity to see it (i.e., the story was beginning to
take on characteristics of the earlier Kecksburg, Aztec and
Roswell UFO crash reports). In one rumour scenario, the UFO
was loaded upon a flatbed railcar that was brought to the site
on a nearby (albeit, long abandoned) railroad spur - and in
another account, two military helicopters were used to lift
the object from the water and place it in an armoured truck.
Curiously, I too became linked to a rather ridiculous rumour
which placed me at the scene as a government agent or high
ranking Air Force officer disguised as a UFO field
investigator.
But
the truth was that I was just a guy who had an interest in the
UFO phenomenon and had been investigating sighting reports for
about two years prior to the incident. I had been in the US
Army 12 years earlier, as a specialist Fourth Class (i.e. not
quite the equivalent of a corporal) in the infantry. I founded
UFORIC, the Philadelphia-based UFO Report and Information
Center, in 1972 and served as its director until 1980. I also
swept the office floor and emptied the waste paper basket. I
was simply a student of the phenomenon, not a self-proclaimed
expert, and I went to Carbondale because the reported incident
interested me. UFORIC was a very small research organisation,
consisting of only five volunteer investigators. Many of our
reports were passed on to us by technicians at the
Philadelphia Franklin Institute's Fels Planetarium, several
police departments, both commercial and military air
facilities and two local newspapers - while direct calls from
the public were also received and routinely investigated.
As
I entered the community of Carbondale, about 4:30 - 5:00 a.m.
on the morning of 11 November, I asked directions to the
police station and briefly conferred with detective sergeant
Dottle. He informed me that Dr Hynek was dispatching a UFO
field investigator from New York State to assist the police in
their efforts to identify and possibly recover the object in
the pond. Sgt Dottle then asked if I would assist him until Dr
Hynek's representative arrived and I agreed to do so. I was
then taken to the crash site which was cordoned off by two
Carbondale police officers and a group of youngsters who were
members of the Civil Air Patrol (i.e., aeronautical boy
scouts).
There
were not any armed troops or technical military contingents of
any kind present. But I did briefly speak to an Air Force
officer (a major or lieutenant-colonel) at the pond much later
in the day. I believe that he was involved with the Civil Air
Patrol's community service related activities at the scene. I
think that the officer's name tag read "Merriman". (?) Anyway,
several volunteer fire companies from neighbouring communities
were summoned and they assisted in the recovery efforts by
pumping thousands of gallons of water from the pond as Sgt
Dottle, Dr Hynek's investigator, Mr Dains, Mr Barry of the
20th Century UFO Bureau and I felt that this was a far safer
method of obtaining a look at the submerged object than
permitting a scuba diver to enter the water.
By
first light, several press people and scores of the general
public were permitted to visit the site, as various attempts
to locate the object were made and radiological surveys were
performed. As the morning wore on, the news media people were
clamouring for a conclusion to the drama as news story
deadlines were rapidly approaching and the crowds which were
estimated at between 1500 to 3000 people were becoming larger
and larger. I later learned that perhaps as many as 10,000
people had jammed the roads leading into the city in an
attempt to see what was going on. Chief Dottle even had
neighbouring community police departments assist with the
control of the increased traffic into the area. It looked just
like a scene from a science fiction movie and fears grew that
emergency vehicles could not have got through if they were
needed. To make matters worse, although we hadn't a ghost of
an idea of what was actually in the water, rumours were
spreading like a brush-fire and a few very vocal UFO
enthusiasts who were milling about at the site were
questioning the effectiveness of the police, fire companies
and UFO researchers' retrieval efforts.
Sgt
Dottle began to fear that some minor incident involving the
control of the crowds might spark a riot (or a panic) that his
small police force couldn't possibly handle. Sgt Dottle found
himself caught in the rather unenviable position of being
damned if he did and damned, still, if he didn't do what
everyone expected of him. He wanted to ensure the safety of
the public, his men and the volunteers at the pond, while the
media and the saucer buffs in the crowd were chomping at the
bit for a quick and spectacular climax to the story. The
pressure and anticipation were building with each passing
hour, and while Mr Dains and I shared Chief Dottle's concerns
about safety, we were also concerned that the mysterious
object in the water be spared from loss or damage by our
recovery efforts.
Of
course, not everyone was on the same page (i.e. thinking about
safety and the preservation of evidence). I distinctly recall
one persistent and annoying fellow asking me why we hadn't
used more fire companies to do the pumping. When I replied
that we didn't think it necessary (or prudent) to leave the
surrounding communities without adequate fire protection, he
grew visibly agitated and said "Well, you should be digging
for that damned flying saucer now that the water level is down
a bit!" Somehow, I knew that no matter how far we dug, if we
still hadn't found anything, this guy would be saying, "Just
two more feet and a bit to the left!" In fact, Sgt Dottle had
requested the use of a large crane fitted with a massive
magnet (i.e., the type used at auto salvage yards) since the
pumping operations which commenced a little before noon hadn't
been very successful, and were taking far longer than
anticipated to complete. Silt, mud and assorted bits of trash
in the pond were clogging the pumping lines and we even had
concerns that the huge magnet might crush whatever was in the
water so we opted to use a backhoe to help lower the water
level of the pond by digging a drainage ditch from it. This
too, was time consuming and there were concerns that the pond
might empty too quickly causing a deluge of polluted (and
possibly radioactive) water to engulf the area. It seemed that
we would have to send in a diver to take a quick look-see at
the object. The diver, Mr Mark Stamey, age 26, was also a
volunteer from New York State. He drove to the crash scene
with a friend after hearing about the UFO incident on a car
radio. He told me that he felt that all the publicity about
his assistance with the sunken UFO would be a real boost for
his fledgling diving business. Stamey also asked me to write
him a note informing his state parole officer that I had
requested he cross state lines to assist in the recovery
operations.
I
told Stamey that I hadn't the authority to do that and
suggested he speak to Mr Dains or Chief Dottle about his
dilemma. I later observed Stamey preparing his diving
equipment and assumed that the question of his parole status
had been straightened out. So, after briefing him on the scant
information we had gathered and conveying our concerns that
the object might still be electrified and/or radioactive, the
diver slipped into his wet suit and prepared to enter the silt
pond.
The
UFO researchers were being interviewed by the press and a TV
station's helicopter circled the pond churning up the water.
Although we still hadn't any solid information on what the
object in the water might be, Dr Hynek's representative and I
were starting to suspect that the incident might be a prank
that the teens had perpetrated on a nothing else to do
Saturday night whim. We thought that perhaps their hoax simply
got out of control and took on a life of its own - and that
the boys may have been too scared to fess up to what they had
done. Of course, it may have been that the boys had witnessed
a meteor or a bolide (a large and occasionally exploding
meteor) streaking across the night sky and mistakenly assumed
that it was the same luminous object that they discovered
moments later in the pond. This seemed to be a reasonable
notion, as the boys' description of the aerial phenomenon they
had observed was absolutely meteoric in character. In fact, I
had very similar reports on file at the UFO report and
information centre, reports that were later verified by
technicians at the Fels Planetarium. One report stated, "About
twenty stories overhead, a white fiery object with a red light
on the underside about centre -flying east to west - it had
sparks on the sides and coming from the rear section." The
sighting duration was 15 seconds. (Mr Sanford Epstein,
Levittown, Pennsylvania, 14 June 1974 - 9:15 p.m. EST).
Moreover,
while attempting to discover who had perpetrated the hoax (if
one had been committed?) was one of the field investigator's
tasks, it was quite naturally, primarily a police matter as a
great deal of the authority’s time and resources were expended
during the 44 hour UFO drama. The UFO researchers’ interests
and responsibilities were to identify the object (if possible)
and to preserve any evidence found from damage or loss (if
possible). They would also gather eyewitness testimony on the
incident to be used in later evaluation and analysis of the
matter and in determining the veracity of the witnesses. But
in the Carbondale case, the researchers were also presented
with the opportunity and distinct privilege of working with
the community's authorities towards a safe and successful
resolution of the incident. Unlike other "downed UFO
incidents" where UFO investigators and civilian volunteers
were reportedly turned away from the area by the military and
police officials, such was definitely not the case at
Carbondale.
According
to the boys, John Lloyd, 14, William Lloyd, 16, and Robert
Gillette, 15, the object that they observed coursing through
the evening sky was a relatively ill-defined flaming mass with
a shower of sparks trailing it as it rapidly travelled on an
east to west course. Report sketches provided by the Lloyd
brothers show an oval object with the descriptive words "red,
yellow and white" printed under the drawing. But an earlier
drawing by Bobby Gillette looks something like a lens seen on
its edge - Gillette's object also has a red dot in its centre.
The teenage trio did not hear any sounds coming from the
object as it descended, according to their first oral and
written accounts - nor did the boys actually see it plummet
into the pond. But one of the lads would later say that he saw
cinders falling from it. My inspection of the alleged crash
site revealed that there were no topographical indicators to
suggest that something like a plane, a large piece of space
junk or a meteor had impacted the pond or the area surrounding
it.
There
wasn't any obvious displacement of earth; there was no
displacement of water from the pond; there were no indicators
of a fire, downed tree limbs or skid marks creating a gouge in
the soil like the one which is said to have been evident at
the J.B. Foster ranch near Roswell, New Mexico in 1947.
Interestingly, the details of the Roswell UFO story were not
very well known by the general public or the press corps at
the time of the Carbondale incident, but the reported UFO
crash at Kecksburg in the western part of Pennsylvania had
occurred nine years earlier and had received some attention by
the press. But Carbondale's UFO (as a structural
configuration) was not observed on the ground or while it was
in the water. No one knew if it was a disc, a sphere like
Sputnik or a cylindrical craft of some kind. There was just
the glowing 5 foot circle of light on the water which the boys
said had sizzled or softy hissed for several seconds.
Interestingly, while the police were poking around (in search
of the submerged object) with a long pole that was fitted with
a fish net, the disc of light suddenly charged their boat and
one officer instinctively drew his revolver and fired at it!
In
the pandemonium of the harrowing moment, the officer lost his
balance and fell out of the boat into the silt pond which was
said to have had a bottom like quicksand! I was unable to
confirm this story with police officials at Carbondale back in
1974, but a deputy sheriff from the neighbouring community of
Honesdale, Pennsylvania later told Ohio MUFON's chief
researcher, Mr Larry Moyers, that Officer Joseph Jacobina (or
Jacobino) had fired six shots at the on-rushing light.
Reportedly, patrolman Mark Trella (or Eltrilla) thought that
he had snagged the object in the fish net at one point while
in the boat,but it seemed to be quite heavy and slipped away.
It was thought that the attempt had up-ended the object and
the light was either facing down into the silt or else, it
went out entirely. When the pole was retracted from the water,
it was noticed that the fish net on the end of it was slightly
torn. But, the effort was not completely in vain as it was
also noted that the 5 foot in diameter disk of light on the
water's surface appeared to emanate from a much smaller point
of light at the bottom of the pond. In other words, the
officers had observed an apparent cone-of-light in the water.
When
Mr Dains took water samples from the pond, I was surprised to
see that the water was basically clear and one could see for
about a depth of 3 to 4 feet into it. I observed a discarded
auto tyre, bits of trash and a sunken vehicle's roof and hood
areas. Of course, looking at the daylight reflecting off the
water's surface made the water appear to be more opaque, and
at certain angles the pond's silt floor appeared to give the
water a brownish-grey cast. The water was indeed polluted, but
it wasn't very discoloured. Naturally, when the pond's silt
and muddy bottom were disturbed the water did become very
cloudy and murky-looking. The pond was an abandoned coal
cleaning breaker pit that had managed to fill up with rain
water over the years. Mr Dains and I also walked around the
pond with instruments to detect magnetic disturbances; none
were noted.
This
cone-of-light seemed to be consistent with Sgt Dottle's early
suspicions that the object was probably a flashlight.
Moreover, Officer Trella's remarks that the object seemed to
be too heavy to be a flashlight were based on the difficulty
that he experienced while attempting to lift the object in the
net on the end of a 10 foot long pole. In fact, he may have
even been struggling with other debris, mud and silt on the
pond's bottom at the time (?). Anyway, it seems that the light
in the water was visible for a period of six to eight hours -
depending upon one's acceptance of the boys' reported
discovery time or the initial observation of it by the
Carbondale police. (i.e. from 7:00-9:00 p.m. on the night of 9
November to approximately 3:00-3:30 a.m. on the morning of the
10th).
It
is entirely possible that when officer Trella attempted to
retrieve the object in the net and he thought it had slipped
away, he may have caused the lantern to fall into another
location on the bottom of the pond. Or he may have merely
nudged the lantern which then resettled itself in the silt,
thereby creating the illusion that it was rushing towards the
boat. Additionally, any fisherman can tell you that lifting
things on the end of a pole is strenuous, and that the object
being lifted is perceived to be heavier and larger than it
really
is. | |
|